I'm not usually a prude so I find it strange to be sharing such a close-minded point of view with everyone however, I just felt so strongly about it that I had to say something. I hope that you don't mind and would be interested to hear your ideas about it.
The other night, while coming home on the bus, I encountered two people that, at first, I thought were mother and son. The woman sat next to me and the younger guy was sitting directly ahead of her - next to one of the other regular passengers I encounter regularly.
This "couple" were having some sort of conversation about people they know. She was older than I am and spoke with an eastern European or Scandinavian accent (it was hard to tell) and he seemed to be in his mid- to late- twenties with long hair and striking eyes. Both were kind of those outdoorsy hippie-types (granola) so I just got to thinking how nice it was for mother & son to be out together sharing the day.
Then, to my surprise, he leaned back and kissed her. From then on, she was leaning forward and kissing him and he was kissing her hand - and she his - all the way home. I wanted to puke.
I didn't have this reaction because of their age - not entirely, that is. I think that I just felt that that whole public display of affection and intimacy quite forced. After all, the only time I see behaviour like that was in film and when silly teenagers who think it's how they should behave when they are a couple. I hardly expected that kind of behaviour from a woman older than I. I almost got the feeling that she was his "sugar mama" and he was just slathering the bullshit on thicker than was necessary. The sad thing was that she bought into it too.
I think that's what made my stomach turn. The fact that a woman who should know better bought into something that exists only in film and when someone wants something from the other. Why do women do that?
It was actually interesting because on that very day, in my Lit class we were talking about poetry that was created just to get women into bed. Maybe I'm just lucky enough to be born in a time when we look at things a little more realistically that I can have this opinion. Love blinds people, for sure but is that really an excuse to act so ridiculously?
Now, you're going to say, Lola, why are you judging this couple? Is it because she's older than him? My answer to that is a resounding no! If it works for a couple to have the woman older, that's great. In fact, I'm a big advocate for that. I just sensed that she was stupid enough to become a dupe for some boy that has amazing eyes. He certainly wasn't my type so I couldn't figure it out. I just have a problem with fakeness. I hate lies and it was most certainly what was going on.
I just hate when women are so desperate for affection that they turn a blind eye to what's going on.
It gives all of us older, single women a bad reputation because people assume that we're all quite desperate. And I, for one, am not.
Moving on, I was reading a friend's blog yesterday and came upon a part where he talked of "evolution" and how young people nowadays have no taste when it comes to the arts. It got me thinking... Can this really be true?
I think that, as we all get older, we realize that the youth of the world are pretty green when it comes to life experience. The thing is, that is the nature of humans or any animals for that matter. When we are born, we have experienced nothing and it's not until we have gone through situations that we gain knowledge. That much, I think we all know.
However, in the case of my friend, attesting to the "poor" taste in music that many younger folks buy into is not entirely their fault. I mean, if it weren't for the adults that allow the "crap" that is considered music these days, then kids wouldn't have that choice. They know that if they appeal to the younger folk on their own level, they will make loads of money. And that's where the problem exists. The almighty currency these companies make from kids.
This generation as well as mine and the one before has somehow come to a place where we are super-consumers. We also have a sense of entitlement that I think is quite dangerous. It's a world for the self-absorbed and seemingly sociopathic folks to get their faces on the cover of magazine and in the news. Many want a piece of this pie. After all, why do we become performers and artists? I think that it is because, deep down, we want the attention and adoration of others. Of course, many are trying to express something or give us a message. But why is an artist's message any more important than the person who still has something to say but isn't as beautiful or media-savvy as say Britney or Posh or whatever new flavour of the week in the modelling world is?
The trouble is that we all buy into this. Maybe we're searching for that mysterious "love" that we see in film that creates feelings of inferiority in many. This is precisely what I was mentioning at the beginning of this post. I think that we all need to question this in our art. Precisely why are we doing this or what are we trying to prove.
I'm not justifying the taste of youth in this post. In fact, I must say that I agree with my friend's opinion of NF however, I think it important to remember that without this kind of evolution we wouldn't be free to express our thought the way we do nowadays. My friend would either still be closeted or dead because he's gay, I would have been married off or even just had no say in life and be a vessel with which to further the human species and for sure, many of the great artists of the past would not have been able to do what they wanted. The thing is, that there could just as easy be a devolution if some world leader decides we shouldn't be able to work if we are a woman or that gays shouldn't exist or that critics to government policy should be killed or if we are too intelligent, we are a danger to world order.
Life really is fickle when we think about it.
Now, on a final note, yesterday, I heard Velvet Revolver do a cover of "Psychokiller" originally by the Talking Heads. Unfortunately for the youth of today, it's a terrible cover. The Talking Heads were ahead of their time and this was a great song - when they sang it. However, this crap version by Scott & his gang just doesn't do it justice. Why do people remake old movies or do "sad" covers of songs? Is it because there is nowhere to go as far as music or film evolution is concerned? Must be because all we're getting now is this crap. Like "Hairspray"... I'd rather watch Ricky Lake and Divine in the original film version if I must. It's just a huge waste of money using stars like Travolta and the others. For what? Because they can rip money out of the next generations pockets?
There it is. It's all about the green! Money, that is.